Share this page
Sign On
Latest comments
- Sam Clarke's submission?
3 weeks 3 days ago - Get the young blood of the HIP HOP, R&B to sign on
3 weeks 3 days ago - This is all going too far ITS
4 weeks 3 days ago - I don't think anyone is
4 weeks 4 days ago - To my Fav tree hugger,
Great
4 weeks 5 days ago - Wow, I don't understand why
5 weeks 13 hours ago - Hi Michael - welcome aboard!
6 weeks 13 hours ago - As a new sign on I'm keen to
6 weeks 1 day ago - Too True...
6 weeks 2 days ago - Nice post, thanks for
8 weeks 4 days ago
NZ stengthens its ambition to fail
NZ stengthens its ambition to fail
Oh dear, it gets worse.
"New Zealand is blaming the Kyoto Protocol for its low emissions target," a delegate (from where I couldn’t possibly divulge) just told me at the climate change talks in Barcelona today.
This comment came after New Zealand spoke in Kyoto Protocol negotiations on the emission reduction targets so far committed to by developed countries (remember New Zealand’s is between zero and 20%). The chair of the negotiations had previously challenged delegates to say how they could increase these targets. Iceland suggested that it could increase its target if some of the rules changed. But New Zealand? Our delegation chose to ignore the chair's request to discuss raising ambition, instead embarrassing itself by suggesting there was every chance it would LOWER its ambition.
New Zealand complained about the risk of businesses moving offshore, before stating that New Zealand was "here to do our fair share". Explain to me how this comment can be reconciled with the fact New Zealand's emissions are going to keep going up under domestic policies? We are currently doing an embarrassingly modest share of the effort needed to keep global warming below 2 degrees.
New Zealand then spoke about the difficulties of splitting its target into domestic reductions, forestry and international offsetting and appeared to blame it all on the Kyoto Protocol. From my seat near the back of the room I could see negotiators laughing quietly and shaking their heads because they thought the explanation was so ridiculous.
- Geoff Keey's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Comments
Adding to the foray, A group formed by Neil and Esther Henderson calling themselves 'Climate Realists' have been collecting signatures to present to Parliament on 25 November.
The petition urges Parliament to "not to commit to any emissions reductions at the Copenhagen climate change negotiations, so that excessive hardship to individual New Zealand families and to the New Zealand economy for no measurable benefit to the climate can be avoided."
More information here: http://www.climaterealists.org.nz/
Larry Baldock from The Kiwi Party is in support of this, has signed and collected signatures for their ridiculous petition - I'm glad we got our message in first.
There's still a way to go though, I am NOT giving up. C'MON JOHN - SIGN ON.
What is even more concerning is these "Climate Realists" are out and about gaining signatures at events and approaching people with a line such as "Will you sign a petition for climate change?"
I wouldn't hesisitate to bet that some are signing this petition thinking that it is the "Sign on" one.
I guess that tricking people into it is the only way they'll get any signatures.