231955 users have signed on
Share this page
Sign On
Latest comments
- New Zélande is a so beautiful
3 weeks 6 days ago - You don't know what power you
11 weeks 5 days ago - You don't know what power you
11 weeks 5 days ago - New Zealand ♥ Lucy Lawless
3 weeks 4 days ago - This is something that
12 weeks 1 day ago - We are at week's World
12 weeks 4 days ago - Esta chegando o dia mundial
13 weeks 6 days ago - Amazon deforestation falls
14 weeks 6 days ago - This was such an eye opening
15 weeks 5 hours ago - Vasamento no Golfo do México
15 weeks 3 days ago
Gearing up for Saturday!
Gearing up for Saturday!
Submitted by Falk Hermenau on Wed, 02/12/2009 - 08:29
Come rain or shine, our army of Sign On volunteers is out on the streets every day promoting the Planet A gig. Just THREE DAYS TO GO! It's going to be ORsome.

- Falk Hermenau's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Home ›



Comments
First there is nothing wrong with a TIDY PLANET POLICY.
But are you sure about the climate change is man made and global warming is CO2 based. I mean have the masses ever been conned before by wrong information. Of course they have..
1) 1916: We are off to war, it will be over by xmas ( streets of london)
2) 1938: Hitler will not invade europe (Uk prime minster Neville Chamberlain)
3) 1975: By there year 2000 there will be a new ice age (Newsweek April 28, 1975).
4) 2000: The world will stop Y2K, computer date issue.
The top MIT professor of climate change concluded that CO2 has no or minimal effect on the climate. If you say MIT is a joke, then you are lost.
Ref: http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-7715-Portland-Civil-Rights-Examiner~y...
This website is full of people, actors, who have not research the issue at all. Sure they are in love with the idea that keeping the planet green is good, me too, but this story of climate warming will tag these people for ever as foolish suckers into a junk science by fools like the fraudsters at CRU (Phil Jones and those dodgy emails) and NIWA !
Fred you're a fool if you buy into that crap.
Here is a list of organizations that accept anthropogenic global warming as real and scientifically well-supported:
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS): http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm
National Academy of Sciences (NAS): http://books.nap.edu/collections/global_warming/index.html
State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) - http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html
The Royal Society of the UK (RS) - http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135
American Geophysical Union (AGU): http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html
American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climatechangeresearch_2003.html
American Institute of Physics (AIP): http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html
American Meteorological Society (AMS): http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS): http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html
Every major scientific institution dealing with climate, ocean, and/or atmosphere agrees that the climate is warming rapidly and the primary cause is human CO2 emissions. In addition to that list, see also this joint statement (PDF) that specifically and unequivocally endorses the work and conclusions of the IPCC Third Assessment report. The statement was issued by:
Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias (Brazil)
Royal Society of Canada
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Academie des Sciences (France)
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Germany)
Indian National Science Academy
Accademia dei Lincei (Italy)
Science Council of Japan
Russian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society (United Kingdom)
National Academy of Sciences (United States of America)
If you look at your statement, Fred, you would realise that you could use exactly the same historical quotes you have used to say that the MIT professor is incorrect.
Afterall, wasnt both the Y2K scientists and Neville Chamberlain some of the best leaders and scientists in their chosen careers and they were wrong. Have you actually amassed all the research about climate change yourself and deducted that there is no staple proof, because otherwise you must realise that you cannot say that a lone professor MIT or not is correct if you do not have viable resources.
Also, the celebrities on this site are not here to say that they have scientific facts to prove climate change, they are here to promote these actions against it, mostly to people who already know the truth.
Think carefully and clinically when calling 18,3189 people foolish suckers into a junk science by fools on their own website. We foolish suckers tend to get offended and fight back.